![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Maximizing Your Aid Eligibility
This page presents a list of strategies for maximizing your
eligibility for need-based student financial aid. These strategies are
based on loopholes in the need analysis methodology and are completely legal.
Parents should be aware of these strategies to avoid several common
mistakes that can negatively impact eligibility for financial aid.
The decision to add this section to the FinAid Page was a difficult
one. We considered the pros and cons for over a year before deciding
to publish the information contained in this section of the page.
Financial aid administrators often criticize this kind of advice
as telling rich people how to look poor. The goal of the financial aid
administrator is to distribute limited funds fairly and they disagree
with anything that smacks of subverting the system. Unfortunately,
need analysis formulas often do not reflect a family's ability to pay,
and are little more than rationing systems. For example, the federal
methodology ignores consumer debt, to the detriment of many families,
making them look more affluent than they really are.
We developed these strategies by analyzing the flaws in the Federal
Need Analysis Methodology. It is quite possible that Congress will
eventually eliminate many of these loopholes. Until this happens, we believe
that revealing these flaws yields a more level playing field and hence
a fairer need analysis process. For example, why should a parent who
conscientiously saves for her children's college education but makes
the mistake of saving the money in her child's name get less aid than
a parent who saves the money in her own name?
Many of these strategies are just good, sound financial planning. For
example, using cash in the bank to pay off credit card debt will
benefit the family financially, by reducing the amount of interest
they are paying, in addition to improving the family's eligibility for
student financial aid.
These strategies are similar to those used
by many financial aid consultants.
Financial aid consultants charge fees to help you complete
the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) and other
financial aid forms in a way that minimizes your Expected Family
Contribution (EFC), among other services. If you decide to use a
financial aid consultant, you should do so with the knowledge that you
can complete the financial aid applications on your own, at no cost.
Several books have been published that also present strategies for
maximizing eligibility for financial aid and completing the FAFSA. You can find these in the
FinAid Page's bibliography.
Of these, the best are:
As a general rule, unless the family is fairly destitute, a decrease
in the EFC will yield an increase in eligibility for student loans and
work-study, not grants. Just because you demonstrate financial
need doesn't mean that the school and government will throw grants and
scholarships your way.
A Word About Honesty
We have not included any strategies that we consider unethical, dishonest, or
illegal. For example, although we may describe some strategies for
sheltering assets, we do not provide techniques for
hiding assets. This is a very important distinction. Likewise, we
strongly discourage any family from trying to qualify a truly
dependent child as an independent or providing false information on a
financial aid form.
It should go without saying, but honesty is the best policy. Tell the
truth on your financial aid applications. It may hurt, but the
penalties for lying are severe.
Be very careful about following any unethical advice. Financial aid
administrators are obligated to notify the US Department of Education
when they encounter cases of fraud. (If they don't, their school is
held liable when the US Department of Education audits them.) Every
school verifies the FAFSAs of at least one-third of their students,
and some schools verify 100% of the financial aid applications. This
is in contrast with the IRS, which audits only a very small percentage
of tax returns. So if you lie on your financial aid forms, there's a
very good chance you'll get caught.
The FAFSA includes the following warning on the front:
You may be asked to provide U.S. income tax returns, the worksheets in
this booklet and other information. If you can't or don't provide
these records to your college, you may not get Federal student aid. If
you get Federal student aid based on incorrect information, you will
have to pay it back; you may also have to pay fines and fees. If you
purposely give false or misleading information on your application,
you may be fined $20,000, sent to prison, or both.
Schools are getting much better at catching fraud. For example, many
schools now require parents who claim to be enrolled in college to
not only provide proof of registration, but a copy of the paid tuition
bill. Some go even so far as to verify the enrollment with the other
school. This is because some financial aid consultants were
advising parents to enroll at another school to qualify themselves as
a member of the household enrolled in college and then let the
enrollment automatically cancel through nonpayment. Similarly, many
schools now require families to sign a release to let the school
obtain the actual income tax returns from the IRS, because some
families were providing false copies of their tax returns. Also, in
cases of divorce or separation, financial aid offices ask for proof of
legal separation, because some families have been falsely claiming to
be separated in order to increase eligibility for financial aid.
Financial aid administrators are especially suspicious when both
parents live at the same address.
A good rule of thumb to follow is: If a reasonable person would feel
uncomfortable telling a financial aid administrator about using a
strategy, don't use it. For example, a reasonable person would not
have a problem with advice to pay off all credit card debt, but would
definitely have problems with advice to provide false copies of income tax
returns or to transfer assets temporarily to a relative.
Ask your school's financial aid administrator
if you have questions about the appropriateness of using any strategy.
Some families feel that a college education should be free ride and that
they are entitled to any financial aid for which they qualify,
especially in light of the increasingly high cost of a college
education. Remember, though, that if you succeed in making yourself
look less affluent than you really are, you're making it harder for
the financial aid administrators to distribute the limited financial
aid funds fairly. Do you really want to be reducing the amount of aid
available to lower income families? Ask yourself whether using each
strategy fits in with your ethical values.
Top 10 Strategies
These strategies will have the largest impact on need-based aid eligibility.
Introduction
In the strategies that follow, the term base year refers to the
tax year prior to the award year, where the award year is the
academic year for which aid is requested. For example, if the student
who is applying for financial aid will matriculate in September
2008,
the base year is the calendar year from January 1 through December 31,
2007. The need analysis process uses financial information from the
base year to estimate the expected family contribution. Many of these
strategies are simply methods of minimizing income during
the base year. Likewise, the value of assets are determined at
the time of application and may have no relation to their value during
the award year.
Keep in mind that the federal regulations governing financial aid
change frequently. There is no guarantee that any of these strategies
will work in the long run, since the federal need analysis methodology
is changed annually by Congress.
Basic Principles
There are several basic principles behind the strategies for
maximizing eligibility for financial aid. These principles include:
Income
Note that many schools do not allow offsetting losses. For example,
you cannot use capital losses to offset your salary.
Moreover, when you withdraw funds from your pension, you may incur a
penalty. It may be better to borrow money from the pension, if
possible. You cannot borrow against your IRA, but you may be able to
borrow against your 401(k) plan.
Some methods of reducing the parents' income include:
Note that making a larger contribution to the parents' retirement
funds doesn't normally affect eligibility for financial aid, because
the contribution gets counted in the formula as untaxed income. It
only works in this case because the Simplified Needs Test depends on
the AGI and not the total income or total available income.
As a general rule, unless the family is completely certain that the
child will not qualify for need-based aid, money should be saved in
the parents' name, not the child's name.
Putting assets in the child's name has one major benefit and two major
risks. The benefit is the tax savings due to the child's lower tax
bracket. The risks, however, often outweigh the benefits. Such a
transfer of assets will result in a reduction in eligibility for
financial aid. Moreover, the child is not obligated to spend the money
on educational expenses.
After the child reaches
age 18 (age 14 in 2005 and before), a family can realize tax savings by placing up to $24,000 a
year in assets in the child's name, because
the income from the assets will be taxed at the child's tax bracket.
(The Uniform Gift to Minors provision in the tax code allows each
parent to give up to $12,000 a year to each child without incurring a
gift tax.)
But the need analysis formulas assume that the child contributes a
much greater portion of his or her assets (and income) than the parents,
with the result that such tax-sheltering strategies often significantly reduce
eligibility for financial aid. In most cases the financial aid "tax"
overwhelms the income tax savings.
Parents should carefully consider the financial aid implications
before transferring money into their child's name. The
advice in this section discusses the advisability of various asset
shifting strategies.
The parents cannot just transfer the assets back into their own
name as college approaches. The assets legally belong to the child,
and the child could sue the parents to recover them. (This happens more
often than you might think. For example, it isn't uncommon for a child
to sue the non-custodial parent in divorce cases.) Moreover, the IRS
could assess back taxes and penalties for such a transfer of assets.
Nevertheless, there are ways to legally shift the child's assets back
into the parents' name. For example, the parents could spend the
child's assets on the child's behalf, provided that the expenses are for the
child's benefit and not part of the usual parental obligations. For
instance, the parent may use the child's assets to pay for summer camp
but not for groceries, clothing, health care or rent. An accountant will be able to help you identify
which expenses qualify. If you can transfer the child's assets back to
the parents in this fashion, do it before the base year to reduce the
impact these assets will have on the need analysis process.
Section 8019(d) of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005
(Public Law 109-171) modified the
financial aid treatment of section 529 college savings plans, prepaid
tuition plans, and Coverdell Education Savings Accounts for dependent
students. Effective July 1, 2006, the custodial versions of these
savings vehicles are not considered an asset of a dependent student.
The US Department of Education is interpreting the law to indicate
that such funds are not reported on the FAFSA. (See
Dear Colleague Letter GEN-06-05
which suggests that if the student and
not the parent is the account owner of the plan, it is not reported
as an asset at all.)
Specifically, to be disregarded as an asset, all of the following must
be true:
Before worrying about shifting assets, first determine who owns the
asset. For example, a bank CD in the parents' name "in trust for" the
child's name is generally a parent asset. The test to use is to
identify who is responsible for paying taxes on the asset's earnings.
For example, if the parent receives a 1099 that reported the earnings
on the parent's social security number, the asset is owned by the
parent. Likewise, if the earnings were reported on the child's social
security number, even if the parent files taxes on behalf of the child,
the asset is owned by the child.
Most need analysis formulas shelter $35,000 to $60,000 of the parents'
assets, depending on the age of the older parent. For most families of
college-age children the asset protection allowance (APA) will be
around $45,000 to $50,000. (The median age of parents with college-age
children is 48. The asset
protection allowance for a family with two parents where the
older parent is 48 years old is $47,700 using 2006-2007 need analysis
tables. The amount fluctuates up and down from year to year, depending
on complex factors involving the consumer price index.)
As a result, only about 10% of families have any contribution from the
parent assets. Even when parent
assets exceed this threshold, they have a negligible impact on the
family's expected family contribution. A $10,000 decrease in parent
assets, for example, will yield only about a 560 decrease in the EFC.
(Also, the Federal Methodology's Simplified Needs Test will ignore
assets altogether when the parents' income is less than $50,000
and all family members are eligible to file an IRS Form 1040A or
1040EZ or aren't required to file an income tax return.) Thus parent
assets do not have
as much of an impact as is normally assumed by most parents.
So before you spend much effort trying to optimize the parents'
assets, use FinAid's EFC calculator
in detailed mode and see whether there is any contribution from
parent assets.
For example, suppose the student has a $20,000 college fund in his or her
own name and the school calculates an expected family contribution of
$13,000, with $7,000 from the student and $6,000 from the parents.
(This assumes that the parents have $107,000 in
assets above any asset protection allowance, that student assets are
assessed at 35% and parent assets at a maximum rate of
5.64%. Effective July 1, 2007, the student asset conversion rate will
change from 35% to 20%.)
These student and parent contribution figures are not targets. Rather than have the parents
contribute $6,000 during the first year, spend all $13,000 from the
student's college fund. After all, the purpose of the college fund is
to pay for the child's college education. The following tables show
the impact of three different asset spending policies:
This yields a total of $33,555 in family assets left over when the student graduates.
This yields a total of $26,634 in family assets left over when the student graduates.
This yields a total of $37,597 in family assets left over when the student graduates.
It is clear that spending the student assets first leaves the family
with the most money left over when the student has finally graduated.
This is a simplified example, but the principle is valid even for more
complicated examples.
Moreover, suppose the cost of attendance is $25,000 and the school
gives the student $2,000 in grants, $7,000 in loans and $3,000 in
employment during the first year. It is better for the family,
financially, to refuse the loans and instead spend all $20,000 of the
student's college fund during the first year.
Assuming that the
family follows a policy of spending the student's assets first,
putting assets in the name of a younger child might yield a small
increase in the family's overall eligibility for financial aid. The
calculations are so complicated, however, and require so many
questionable assumptions that this strategy is probably not worthwhile.
The only case in which this strategy might work is when the younger
sibling will never attend college, as might happen with a severely
disabled child.
On the other hand, many schools now ask for the assets owned by the
student's siblings, so this strategy may affect the awarding of
institutional funds.
For example, if you've been saving money in the bank for a specific
purpose, such as a big dollar-item purchase, use it for that purpose
before you file the FAFSA, not after. You cannot ignore the
money even if you plan to use it the day after you file the FAFSA. If
the money is there, even only temporarily, it must be reported.
Needless to say, the student's
assets should be spent before dipping into the parent's assets. So
instead of giving the student a car, the parents should let the
student buy a car with the student's own money.
Note that computer costs drop significantly every year and many
schools have arranged special educational discounts with major
computer manufacturers, so it may not be worthwhile to buy a computer
ahead of time. Other expenses, such as a dorm fridge and microwave
oven, are definitely worthwhile.
The federal methodology does not count boats as an asset, but several
private colleges and universities count the family boat as an asset
when allocating institutional funds. Likewise, some schools will ask
whether the student owns a car and when it was purchased.
During the base year, however, any pre-tax contributions to retirement
funds are not sheltered because the need analysis formulas
count these contributions as untaxed income. It is still worth
contributing to your retirement fund during the base year, because
this shelters the money from being assessed during the subsequent years.
Loans
The only kind of debt that counts in the need analysis process is that
which is secured by property. For example, the mortgage on a second
(vacation) home offsets the value of the home and a capital loan for
your business offsets the value of the equipment purchased using the loan.
Number of Family Members in College
Many need analysis formulas divide the parent contribution
among all children in college. (Previously this was "all family
members in college", but the rules changed because of abuse.) A family
which doesn't qualify
for financial aid when one student is in school may suddenly qualify
when two or more children are enrolled at the same time. (The parent
contribution will increase a little because the income protection
allowance depends on the number of family members in school, but the
change is not very significant and splitting the parent contribution
among several children more than compensates for any increase.)
For example, suppose the need analysis formula calculates a parent
contribution of $17,000 when one student is in school and a student
contribution of $2,000. With college
expenses of $19,000 a year, the student will have a financial need of
$2,000 and will probably not be eligible for much
financial aid. But next year, when the student's sibling is
also enrolled, the parent contribution is split in half. Even though
the parent contribution has increased a little, to $18,000, each
student is expected to receive $9,000 from their parents. With college
expenses of $21,000 and a student contribution of $2,000, each student
now has a financial need of $10,000 ($21,000 less an EFC of $11,000),
and both will be eligible for some financial aid.
However, as noted above, most of the $10,000 in financial aid in this
hypothetical example will be in the form of loans. A typical financial
aid package might include a $5,500 Stafford Loan, a $2,500 Perkins
loan and a $2,000 work-study job. Although these low-interest loans
do represent financial assistance, many families only consider grants
and scholarships that don't need to be repaid to be true financial
aid. Don't be misled into thinking than a decrease in the EFC will
mean that somebody else pays.
So there are several strategies that depend on increasing the number
of family members in school at the same time.
Note that having a parent go back to school to finish their education
is no longer as effective in improving aid eligibility, because
parents are no longer included in the number in
college figures. Congress changed the formula because there was a lot
of abuse (e.g., parents with PhDs or MDs registering at a community college
to get their associate's degree, but not actually attending classes or
even paying the tuition bill).
If you are a parent who is legitimately going back to school to finish
your education or pick up an additional degree, provide documentation
of this to the school's financial aid administrator and ask for a
professional judgment review. The school has the authority to deduct
the parent's actual education expenses from income or compensate in
other ways. Since there has been a history of fraud in this area, you
will have to convince the financial aid administrator that you are
genuine. The financial aid administrator has the final say in this
matter. He or she will probably want to see paid bills from the bursar
from both semesters, proof that you've actually been attending
classes, and grade reports.
If the parents have been thinking about returning to school, going to
school at the same time as your children can increase financial aid
eligibility for both student and parent.
Number of People in Household
A person counts as a member of the household if they get more
than half their support from the student's parents. The student is
also counted, regardless of where the student gets his or her support.
This has many consequences for the aid application. For example, a
student could arrange to have the parent with the lower income and
assets be their custodial parent simply by living with them.
It can also lead to a student being counted twice for financial aid
purposes. For example, suppose a student's parents get divorced and the
non-custodial parent remarries and has a family of his own. If he
provides more than half of the student's support, when his
children apply for financial aid, he may count the student as a member
of his family. The custodial parent, who fills out the financial aid
application with the student, also gets to count the student as a
member of her family.
If the custodial parent remarries, the new spouse's finances will be
considered by the need analysis formula. Prenuptial agreements have
absolutely no effect on need analysis. (A prenuptial agreement is
between the two individuals who agree to it and cannot be binding on
a third party, the government and the schools.)
The requirements for a student to be considered independent are rather strict. Only two
are reasonably under the student's control and those are
If a student gets married after filing the FAFSA, it will
have no effect on the current year's need analysis. You can't change
your dependency status mid-year by getting married. A mid-year change
in marital status will affect dependency status only in subsequent years.
Independent student status does not always lead to an increase in
eligibility for financial aid. Although it does mean that the
parents' finances are not considered by the need analysis process, a
student who gets married will have to include the financial
information for his or her spouse.
Many parents mistakenly believe that if a student is not claimed as an
exemption on the tax return for two years, the student is independent.
This "Bright Line Test" has not been in effect since 1992, when the rules changed. The
requirements for independent student status are spelled out on the
FAFSA. The financial aid administrator may make exceptions on a case
by case basis, but will only do so in extreme circumstances, such as a
documented adversarial relationship (e.g., evidence of sexual or
physical abuse, such as court protection from abuse orders, social
worker reports, etc.), abandonment or inability to locate the parents,
and the parents both being incarcerated. Just because the student is
self-supporting doesn't mean he or she will qualify as an independent student.
Financing College Costs
Section 529 Plans
Effective July 1, 2006, prepaid tuition plans are treated as an asset
of the account owner, with an asset value equal to the refund value of
the account. This is a more favorable financial aid treatment than the
previous treatment, which considered such accounts to be a
resource. The current treatment has a maximum impact of 5.64%,
compared with the dollar-for-dollar reduction in aid eligibility for resources.
As noted previously, the custodial versions of 529 college savings
plans, prepaid tuition plans and Coverdell education savings accounts
are disregarded on the FAFSA if the student is a dependent student.
Such plans will also be disregarded if the account owner is someone
other than the student or parent, such as a grandparent, aunt or uncle.
|
| Home | Loans | Scholarships | Savings | Military Aid | Other Types of Aid | Financial Aid Applications Answering Your Questions | Calculators | Beyond Financial Aid | Site Map | About FinAid® |
| Copyright © 2008 by FinAid Page, LLC. All rights reserved. Mark Kantrowitz, Publisher www.FinAid.org |